< link rel="DCTERMS.replaces" href="http://justtakeitdown.blogspot.com/" >

Wednesday, August 02, 2006

Abortionists investigated for possible Infant Murder

Read Story

I can't say I'd be surprised; to the abortionist, logically, what difference does it make?

2 Comments:

Anonymous Christine Lamech said...

Daniel-

You have hit the nail on the head. Some people seem to think that there is a big difference between a baby in the womb and one that is already born. However, this is not true. One person I know tried to say that an unborn baby still relies on the mother to survive, so that means the baby is still part of the mother's body. This supposedly gives the woman the right to end the baby's life. Excuse me, but I have yet to see a newborn that can feed, clothe, and change itself. Does this mean that the mother should be able to kill the child after it is born? Apparently, the abortionist in the article had already carried this thought process to its logical conclusion. When it all comes down to it, a baby's right to live (as determined by liberals) is based on arbitrary values that have no basis.

August 02, 2006 5:44 PM  
Blogger BigShot said...

I agree with both of you 100%. All normal mothers when they find out they are pregnant they immediatly start taking better care of themselves which in essence you are taking care of your unborn child. Also people never refer to the child in the mothers womb as anything else but a child. All liberals, and any abortionist have everything wrong and no logical explination why to kill a breathing human being!!

August 03, 2006 5:47 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Alliance Blog Roll